Performance of ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in the evaluation of skin atrophy in patients with long-term oral glucocorticoid therapy in a tertiary rheumatology center

Timo Turowski; Martin Fleck; Boris Ehrenstein; Wolfgang Hartung; Florian Günther

doi:10.1055/a-2479-8829

Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Table of Contents

Ultraschall Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2479-8829

Original Article

Performance of ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in the evaluation of skin atrophy in patients with long-term oral glucocorticoid therapy in a tertiary rheumatology center

Ultrahochfrequenz-Sonografie bei der Evaluation der Hautatrophie bei Patienten mit systemischer Langzeit-Glukokortikoid-Therapie in einem rheumatologischen Tertiärzentrum

Timo Turowski

¹Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Asclepios Clinic Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany

,

Martin Fleck

¹Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Asclepios Clinic Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany

,

Boris Ehrenstein

¹Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Asclepios Clinic Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany

,

Wolfgang Hartung

¹Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Asclepios Clinic Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany

,

Florian Günther

²Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Asclepios Clinic Bad Abbach, Regensburg, Germany

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose

Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHF-US) allows visualization of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis and precise measurement of skin thickness. The aim of this study was to assess the performance and interobserver reliability of UHF-US for measuring skin thickness in patients with long-term systemic glucocorticoid (GC) therapy compared to patients without GC therapy or treated for a shorter period.

Materials and Methods

156 patients with known or suspected inflammatory rheumatic diseases underwent US evaluation for skin thickness by 3 experts in 3 anatomical sites (hand, distal, and proximal forearm). 87 patients were classified as “frequent users” who had received continuous oral GCs for at least one year or at least 3 years with various interruptions. 69 patients without any oral GC therapy in the past or treated for a shorter period were classified as “non-frequent users”.

Results

UHF-US allowed a precise measurement of skin thickness. Skin thickness at all 3 anatomical sites was significantly decreased in “frequent users” of GCs compared to “non-frequent users” (distal and proximal forearm: p < 0.001; hand: p < 0.05). At all 3 anatomical sites, skin thickness was decreased in patients with clinically assessed parchment-like skin compared to patients without parchment-like skin (distal and proximal forearm: p < 0.001; hand: p < 0.05). Interobserver variability was excellent [hand intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.99; proximal forearm ICC = 0.85; distal forearm ICC = 0.84].

Conclusion

These data support the idea of UHF-US as an objective and reliable imaging tool for monitoring skin atrophy as adverse effects of GC therapy.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Die Ultrahochfrequenz-Sonografie (UHFS) ermöglicht die Visualisierung und Messung von Epidermis, Dermis und Subkutis. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war die Evaluation der Leistungsfähigkeit und Interrater-Reliabilität der UHFS bei der Messung der Hautdicke bei Patienten mit systemischer Langzeit-Glukokortikoid-Therapie..

Material und Methode

Bei 156 Patienten mit bekannter oder vermuteter rheumatischer Erkrankung wurde die Hautdicke mittels UHFS an der Hand, am distalen und am proximalen Unterarm gemessen. 87 Patienten, die mindestens ein Jahr lang kontinuierlich oder mindestens 3 Jahre lang mit Unterbrechungen orale Glukokortikoide (GC) eingenommen hatten, wurden als „frequent Users‟ klassifiziert. 69 Patienten ohne oder mit kürzerer GC Therapie wurden als „non-frequent Users‟ klassifiziert.

Ergebnisse

Die UHFS ermöglichte eine präzise Messung der Hautdicke. An allen 3 anatomischen Stellen war die Hautdicke der „frequent Users‟ im Vergleich zu den „non-frequent Users‟ signifikant geringer (distaler und proximaler Unterarm: p < 0.001; Hand: p < 0.05). An allen 3 anatomischen Stellen war die Hautdicke bei Patienten, bei denen klinisch eine Pergamenthaut diagnostiziert worden war, im Vergleich zu Patienten ohne Pergamenthaut geringer (distaler und proximaler Unterarm: p < 0.001; Hand: p < 0.05). Die Interrater-Reliabilität war exzellent ([Intraklassen-Korrelationskoeffizient Hand (IKK) = 0,99; IKK proximaler Unterarm = 0,85; IKK distaler Unterarm = 0.84].

Schlussfolgerung

Die Daten der vorliegenden Studie legen nahe, dass die UHFS als objektives und reliables Bildgebungsverfahren zur Erfassung der GC-assoziierten Hautatrophie geeignet ist.

Keywords

Musculoskeletal System - Glucocorticoids - Skin atrophy

Full Text

References

References
1 Palmowski Y, Buttgereit T, Buttgereit F. “The 70th anniversary of glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases: the second youth of an old friend”. Rheumatology 2019; 58: 580-587
2 Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S. et al. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79: 19-30
3 Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dejaco C. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. JAMA 2020; 324: 993-994
4 Palmowski Y, Buttgereit T, Dejaco C. et al. “Official View” on Glucocorticoids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of International Guidelines and Consensus Statements. Arthritis Care Res 2017; 69: 1134-1141
5 Ocon AJ, Reed G, Pappas DA. et al. Short-Term dose and duration-dependent glucocorticoid risk for cardiovascular events in glucocorticoid-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80: 1522-1529
6 Strangfeld A, Richter A, Siegmund B. et al. Risk for lower intestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in comparison to treatment with other biologic or conventional synthetic DMARDs. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 504-510
7 Bergstra SA, Sepriano A, Kerschbaumer A. et al. Efficacy, duration of use and safety of glucocorticoids: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82: 81-94
8 Smolen JS, Landewé RB, Bergstra SA. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82: 3-18
9 George MD, Baker JF, Winthrop K. et al. Risk for serious infection with low-dose glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173: 870-878
10 Roubille C, Richer V, Starnino T. et al. The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 480-489
11 Van Ouwerkerk L, Boers M, Emery P. et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis on continued use of glucocorticoids after their initiation as bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 82 (04) 468-475
12 Hoes JN, Jacobs JW, Verstappen SM. et al. Adverse events of low- to medium-dose oral glucocorticoids in inflammatory diseases: a meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1833-1838
13 Cheah JTL, Robson JC, Black RJ. et al. The patient’s perspective of the adverse effects of glucocorticoid use: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. From an OMERACT working group. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50 (05) 996-1005
14 van der Goes MC, Jacobs JW, Boers M. et al. Monitoring adverse events of low-dose glucocorticoid therapy: EULAR recommendations for clinical trials and daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis 2010 69(11):1913– 1919;
15 Aschoff R, Lang A, Koch E. Effects of Intermittent Treatment with Topical Corticosteroids and Calcineurin Inhibitors on Epidermal and Dermal Thickness Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2022; 35: 41-50
16 Cossmann M, Welzel J. Evaluation of the atrophogenic potential of different glucocorticoids using optical coherence tomography, 20-MHz ultrasound and profilometry; a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J of Dermatol 2006; 155: 700-706
17 Kolbe L, Kligman AM, Schreiner V. et al. Corticosteroid-induced atrophy and barrier impairment measured by non-invasive methods in human skin. Skin Res Technol 2001; 7: 73-77
18 Korting HC, Unholzer A, Schäfer-Korting M. et al. Different skin thinning potential of equipotent medium-strength glucocorticoids. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2002; 15 (02) 85-91
19 Hoffmann K, Auer T, Stücker M. et al. Comparison of skin atrophy and vasoconstriction due to mometasone furoate, methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998; 10 (02) 137-142
20 Costantino F, Carmona L, Boers M. et al. EULAR recommendations for the reporting of ultrasound studies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80 (07) 840-847
21 Gohar F, Windschall D. The new role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in the treat-to-target management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology 2021; 60 (05) 2046-205
22 Lepri G, Hughes M, Allanore Y. et al. The role of skin ultrasound in systemic sclerosis: looking below the surface to understand disease evolution. The Lancet Rheumatology 2023; 5: 422-425
23 Naredo E, Pascau J, Damjanov N. et al. Performance of ultra-high-frequency ultrasound in the evaluation of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: a preliminary report. Rheumatology 2020; 59 (07) 1671-1678
24 Flower VA, Barratt SL, Hart DJ. et al. High-frequency Ultrasound Assessment of Systemic Sclerosis Skin Involvement: Intraobserver Repeatability and Relationship With Clinician Assessment and Dermal Collagen Content. J Rheumatol 2021; 48 (06) 867-876
25 Izzetti R, Vitali S, Aringhieri G. et al. Ultra-High Frequency Ultrasound, A Promising Diagnostic Technique: Review of the Literature and Single-Center Experience. Can Assoc Radiol J 2021; 72 (03) 418-431
26 Derraik JG, Rademaker M, Cutfield WS. et al. Effects of age, gender, BMI, and anatomical site on skin thickness in children and adults with diabetes. PLoS One 2014; 9 (01) e86637
27 Huntley AC, Walter Jr RM. Quantitative determination of skin thickness in diabetes mellitus: relationship to disease parameters. J Med 1990; 21 (05) 257-264
28 Branchet MC, Boisnic S, Frances C. et al. Skin thickness changes in normal aging skin. Gerontology 1990; 36 (01) 28-35